At Laguna Seca, I needed the OM SYSTEM OM-1 Mark II to keep pace with historic cars being driven as they were intended, not sitting still for display.
At the Rolex Monterey Motorsports Reunion, the past does not remain behind ropes or beneath museum lighting. It moves. It accelerates down the front straight, shifts its weight through Laguna Seca’s corners and disappears into the Corkscrew with an exhaust note that belongs to another era.
Photographing that experience requires more than technical performance. A camera must respond quickly enough to capture a moment that cannot be repeated, while remaining unobtrusive enough to allow the photographer to stay connected to everything happening around them.
During the Reunion, I had the opportunity to use the OM SYSTEM OM-1 Mark II with the M.Zuiko Digital ED 50-200mm F2.8 IS PRO and M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO. Across long days, changing light and generations of racing machinery, the system proved capable of doing something particularly important: allowing me to concentrate on the photograph rather than the equipment.
Disclosure: OM SYSTEM provided the camera and lenses on loan for evaluation. No payment was received, and all opinions in this review are my own.
A Camera Built for Movement
Laguna Seca rewards photographers who are willing to move.
The circuit’s elevation changes create dramatically different perspectives, but reaching them means walking between shooting locations while carrying everything required for a complete day trackside. From the Andretti Hairpin to the Corkscrew, the physical demands of covering the circuit can become as significant as the photographic ones.
That was where the OM-1 Mark II first made an impression.
Its compact, weather-sealed body felt secure and substantial without becoming burdensome. Paired with either lens, the system remained comfortable enough to carry throughout the day, allowing me to move quickly when the light changed or when another location offered a stronger perspective.
The camera never felt delicate or hesitant. Its controls were accessible, its electronic viewfinder remained responsive, and the body felt balanced even when working with the reach of the 300mm F4 IS PRO.
It became a camera I could carry without constantly thinking about carrying it.
A Photographic History Connected to Motorsport
Using the OM-1 Mark II beside some of motorsport’s most important machinery also carried a sense of continuity. The OM SYSTEM name belongs to a photographic lineage that has long valued compact dimensions, mobility and serious optical performance.
Olympus introduced its first camera, the Semi-Olympus I, with the original Zuiko lens in 1936. That pursuit of smaller, lighter equipment became increasingly recognizable through cameras such as the Olympus Pen in 1959 and the original OM system that followed. The principle was consistent: professional capability did not need to be inseparable from unnecessary size.
That philosophy has an obvious relationship with motorsport photography. Working trackside has always required photographers to react quickly, carry equipment over considerable distances and trust that their cameras will perform when a car appears for only a few seconds.
Olympus also formed a direct connection with Formula One during one of Ferrari’s most successful eras. The company became an official sponsor of Scuderia Ferrari in 2003 and continued that relationship in 2004, placing the Olympus name on cars driven by Michael Schumacher and Rubens Barrichello.
The partnership extended beyond branding. Olympus’s official F1 photographers used the E-1 digital SLR to document Grands Prix, while the company’s industrial videoscopes and fiberscopes were used by Ferrari engineers to inspect internal engine components at the circuit without completely dismantling the engines. Photography, precision optics and racing engineering met within the same working environment.
Olympus’s imaging business was transferred to OM Digital Solutions in 2021, and today’s OM SYSTEM continues that camera heritage in a new form. Standing at Laguna Seca with the OM-1 Mark II, the connection did not feel purely historical. Its compact construction, long-lens reach and focus on mobility reflected many of the same ideas that shaped the cameras carrying the Olympus name decades earlier.
Autofocus That Felt Like a Cheat Code
Motorsport photography is built around anticipation. The photographer must understand where a car will be, how it will move and what the background will look like before it reaches the frame.
The OM-1 Mark II’s Motorsports subject-detection autofocus did not replace that understanding. Instead, it gave me more freedom to act on it.
The camera recognized cars quickly as they entered the frame and tracked them with impressive confidence. This was particularly noticeable when photographing tightly grouped fields, where several cars could approach together before separating under braking or changing position through a corner.
Once the OM-1 Mark II identified the intended subject, it stayed with it. Cars approaching head-on, moving laterally across the frame or changing direction through a bend were followed with a level of consistency that allowed me to focus on timing, composition and the feeling of movement.
At times, it almost felt like a cheat code in a favorite racing game.
The challenge of motorsport photography was still present. I still needed to read the racing line, choose the right shutter speed and anticipate the moment. The difference was that the camera removed much of the hesitation between seeing the photograph and capturing it.
At an event where many of the cars may only pass your position a handful of times, that confidence matters.
The 50-200mm F2.8 IS PRO: Ready for Almost Everything
The M.Zuiko 50-200mm F2.8 IS PRO became the lens I could rely on when I did not know exactly what the next moment would bring.
On the OM-1 Mark II, its field of view is equivalent to approximately 100-400mm on a full-frame system. That range was exceptionally useful around Laguna Seca, where the distance between photographer and subject can change dramatically depending on the corner and available access.
At the wider end, I could show more of the environment and allow the circuit to become part of the story. The dry California landscape, the elevation and the recognizable shape of Laguna Seca all contributed to the sense of place.
A moment later, I could zoom closer and isolate a driver’s helmet, the movement of a front wheel or the unmistakable details of a historic racing car. That flexibility was invaluable when the field arrived faster than expected or when two cars created an unplanned composition.
The constant f/2.8 aperture also gave the images a strong separation between the cars and their surroundings. Backgrounds became controlled and unobtrusive, leaving the shapes, colors and period liveries to command attention.
Its autofocus felt immediate and worked naturally with the OM-1 Mark II’s subject detection. When a car appeared over a rise or entered the frame at speed, the combination responded without making the moment feel uncertain.
For panning, the lens offered an especially useful balance. It had enough presence to remain steady throughout the movement, but it was light enough to follow car after car without becoming exhausting. That made it possible to experiment with slower shutter speeds and preserve the sensation of speed through blurred wheels and sweeping backgrounds.
The 50-200mm F2.8 IS PRO did not feel like a compromise between reach and versatility. It felt like a lens built for the unpredictable rhythm of a race weekend.
The 300mm F4 IS PRO: Finding Photographs Across the Circuit
The M.Zuiko 300mm F4 IS PRO changed how I saw Laguna Seca.
Its approximately 600mm full-frame-equivalent field of view reached across sections of the circuit that would otherwise have felt photographically distant. Safety barriers, restricted areas and the natural geography of the track often place photographers far from the ideal composition, but this lens made those distances feel manageable.
Through the viewfinder, details that appeared small to the eye suddenly became complete photographs.
The lens allowed me to isolate cars against cleaner backgrounds, compress the landscape and capture details that might otherwise have disappeared within a wider scene. Bodywork, helmet designs, suspension movement and the expressions visible through open cockpits were rendered with remarkable clarity.
Its fixed focal length required greater discipline. There was no zoom ring to rescue a composition when a car filled the frame more quickly than expected. I had to decide where the photograph would happen, establish the framing and trust the car to arrive within it.
That process felt appropriate for the Reunion. Many of these cars reward careful observation. Their shapes, movements and mechanical details deserve more than a hurried reaction.
When the timing came together, the 300mm F4 IS PRO produced some of the most deliberate and visually powerful images of the event.
Stabilization That Supported the Moment
Long lenses reveal every unnecessary movement, particularly when tracking a distant car or trying to maintain a precise point of focus.
The stabilization of the OM-1 Mark II and the lenses brought a reassuring sense of control to the viewfinder. This was especially valuable with the 300mm F4 IS PRO, where its reach could have made handheld framing considerably more difficult.
Instead, the view remained composed enough to follow cars naturally and make small adjustments without fighting the equipment.
The stabilization was equally helpful during panning. Technique still mattered, but the steadier view made it easier to remain connected to a specific point on the car throughout the movement.
Away from the circuit, it also became useful in the paddock. The Reunion is as much about quiet details as it is about racing. Hands working beneath an open engine cover, drivers preparing to leave the assembly area and historic cars sitting beneath changing light all form part of the event’s story.
Being able to work handheld gave me the freedom to respond to those moments without turning them into a production.
Image Quality With Room to Remember the Scene
The OM-1 Mark II produced files with strong detail, natural color and enough flexibility to preserve the character of the Reunion during editing.
Laguna Seca’s light can be demanding. Bright California sun reflects from windscreens and polished bodywork, while shadows can conceal details beneath wheel arches, inside cockpits and around the paddock.
The files retained useful information across those conditions. Colors remained rich without becoming artificial, and the period liveries carried the depth and individuality that made them so recognizable.
The photographs responded well to careful processing, allowing exposure, contrast and color to be refined without losing the natural atmosphere of the day.
That mattered to me because the goal was never to make the Reunion appear more dramatic than it truly was. The drama was already present in the cars, the circuit and the history surrounding them. The files simply needed to preserve it honestly.
A System That Stayed Out of the Way
A long day trackside often reveals the weaknesses of a camera more clearly than any controlled test.
Batteries are tested by continuous autofocus, burst shooting, image review and constant use of the electronic viewfinder. Equipment becomes heavier with every climb. Small delays become more noticeable when another group is already approaching.
The OM-1 Mark II handled that workload without becoming a distraction. Additional batteries remained an essential part of my kit, as they would for any full day of professional coverage, but power management never dictated how or when I photographed.
More importantly, the system remained manageable.
Its size made it easier to move through the crowded paddock, change position quickly and remain ready when something unexpected happened. At the Reunion, those unplanned moments can become some of the most meaningful photographs of the weekend.
A camera cannot create that awareness, but it can either support it or interrupt it. The OM-1 Mark II supported it.
Final Verdict
The OM SYSTEM OM-1 Mark II proved itself to be an exceptionally capable motorsport camera at an event where every frame carried a sense of history.
It was fast enough to follow cars built across generations of racing, precise enough to preserve their individual details and light enough to remain with me throughout demanding days at Laguna Seca.
The 50-200mm F2.8 IS PRO was the adaptable trackside companion. It moved naturally between environmental photographs, close racing, detailed compositions and panning shots without forcing me to step away from the moment.
The 300mm F4 IS PRO offered something different. Its extraordinary reach encouraged patience and precision, uncovering photographs from across the circuit that would otherwise have remained out of reach.
Together, the two lenses created a remarkably complete motorsport system, while the OM-1 Mark II’s subject detection and stabilization gave me the confidence to concentrate on the story unfolding in front of me.
The Reunion is not defined only by the cars that attend or the laps they complete. It is found in the first sound of an engine returning to life, in the recognition of a familiar livery and in the emotion shared by the people who remember what these machines once represented.
It is there when a historic car enters the Corkscrew and, for a few seconds, the distance between motorsport’s past and present disappears.
The OM-1 Mark II allowed me to remain present for those moments. It responded quickly when the racing demanded it, became quiet when the story required it and helped me preserve an event that felt as emotional as it was historic.
I am deeply grateful to OM SYSTEM for giving me the opportunity to use the OM-1 Mark II, M.Zuiko Digital ED 50-200mm F2.8 IS PRO and M.Zuiko Digital ED 300mm F4 IS PRO for the Rolex Monterey Motorsports Reunion.
The camera and lenses did more than help me document the event. They allowed me to give its history, movement and emotion the attention they deserved.
Article and photography by James Hedley — Speed & Spirit Media.
Camera & Craft
Explore OM SYSTEM Motorsport Photography
Continue with trackside camera and lens field reviews, or discuss an assignment-led equipment feature with Speed & Spirit Media.
Explore complete 2026 Rolex Monterey Motorsports Reunion coverage →